Category 1

Why breaking up with your female friends is more painful than losing a lover

Mymothergave me the best gift imaginable – three sensationalsisters. Sisters possess a psychological shorthand; instinctively understanding each other. When one of us is going through a rough time, the other three rally with offers of chicken soup and/or internal organs. If under attack, the wagons circle. Although… wagons? Who am I kidding? Having three formidable sisters on your side is like having a bombproof, flame-retardant armoured vehicle on hand for quick getaways.

The Independent US Carrie and Miranda going head to head in  ‘And Just Like That’ finale (HBO Max/Sky)

Of course, it’s not the same for all sisters. In fact, some sisters have enough chips on their shoulders to open a casino.Olivia de Havillandand her sister Joan Fontaine spent their lives circling each other like Cold War spies. When Fontaine was awarded the Oscar that de Havilland expected to win, it was no-talkies for a decade.

I was lucky enough to be friends with one of the world’smost famous sisters, Jessica Mitford. When her sibling, novelist Nancy, commented that “Sisters are a defence against life’s cruel circumstances,” Jessica retorted, “Sisters are life’s cruel circumstances.” But then again, Jessica, a communist,had to deal with Diana, a fascist, and Unity, who adored Hitler, and Debs, who became a duchess. I suspect it would have been safer to fly an American jet into Iranian airspace than attend a Mitford family gathering.

Kathy (second left) with her mother Val and sisters, Elizabeth, Jenny and Carolyn (Supplied)

Thankfully, my sisters and I are not as disparate as the Mitfords. In fact, it’s our contrasting characters that make us stronger. Together, our various fortes combine to make up one pretty formidable person and I know how lucky I am.

But for those who are not lucky enough to have biological sisters, there is, of course, the “sisterhood”, and, in many ways, friends are just as important. My best girlfriends are like Orion’s Belt; always there, lined up alongside each other. Whenever I feel lost and can’t find my place in life, my girlfriends are my bookmark. Loving, loyal girlfriends – and you know who you are – lift you two octaves up on the happiness scale without even realising they’re doing so. On a girls’ night out, I sometimes feel like I’ll have to be hospitalised from hilarity. Laughter effervesces up in us like champagne as we quaff and quip and dance to female torch songs until the wee hours. Nor do we care that our over-exuberant mum manoeuvres, circa 1982, often leave us with a bad case of ARDI (Abba Related Dance Injuries).

Female friendships can be as fulfilling, intense and nourishing as any romance. Even more so. Which is why it’s so painful when they fall apart. A breakup with a best girlfriend shatters your equilibrium. Once that familiar foundation is knocked out from under you, it’s impossible to keep your balance. In fact, I’ve suffered worse heartbreak over the loss of a good girlfriend than a lover.

My first intensely emotional relationship was with a girlfriend. We were inseparable from 13 to 20. I would have taken a bullet for her. And not just a light graze either, but a full-onPeaky Blinders-type machine-gun body strafe. And so when she suddenly, inexplicably dropped me, I cried for months. I think I actually suffered a bit of a mini breakdown. I was savaged by nightmares for years.

Kathy with some of her most loyal and loving girlfriends, whose friendships she treasures (Supplied)

Aged 22, I fell out with another close girlfriend after she slept with my boyfriend. The woman I so admired turned out to be a vampire on a day pass. I’d been happily floating about on the love boat, which she’d totallyTitanic-ed. When confronted, she apologised. “I don’t blame you for hating me.”

Advertisement

“Hate you? Oh no. Not really… sometimes whole seconds elapse where I forget that you destroyed my life.” Her treachery hurt every time I thought about it, like a nerve exposed to air.

In my thirties, a close girlfriend went behind my back to secure a job I’d told her about. The scar tissue of those earlier breakups immediately tore open. The pain rushed back in one big, anguishing blast. There was no way we could stay friends. Her betrayal was like a shadow on the X-ray of my spirit – nagging at my confidence.

All of these experiences have probably gone on to inform my latest novel, in which two sisters, Izzy and Verity, have gone five years of radio silence after one stole the other’s husband. But when their mum goes missing, they have no choice but to join forces to find her. There’s anger, recriminations and much funny, bitchy banter, but eventually Izzy admits, “My husband ran away with my sister – and I miss her.” Verity also confesses, “She’s not just my sister, she’s my best friend. For example, she’ll swear that I’m a natural redhead and I tell everyone that she’s too skinny.”

‘The Sisterhood Rules’ explores the special bond between women – and its tribulations (Aria)

I felt sure I could never forgive the female friends who betrayed me, not even if we were marooned on an island with no other castaways. But now in my sixties, I find that my anger has receded, like a tide on a beach. All that’s left is the emotional driftwood. I suddenly can’t understand the weight and importance I’ve given to the cargo I’ve carried for so long.

Maybe that is why my novel is about reconciliation. Clearly, there’s so little harmony in the world right now; it’s imperative we try to find unity in our own lives. Especially with our female friends. Why? Well, the world is not getting better for women. A woman born in America now has fewer rights than her grandmother. Abortion bans in America; the erasing of women in Afghanistan. And what about Iran? In our own society, women have to deal with the gender pay gap, upskirting, Andrew Tate, incels, the manosphere, revenge porn, trolling, date-rape, grooming and stealthing. The conviction rate for rape is limbo-low, and domestic violence figures sky-high; one in four women will be sexually assaulted or raped in her lifetime.

But the sisterhood is powerful. The #MeToo movement was a global solidarity movement among women that went on to bring down Harvey Weinstein. Although, of course, only one person is in jail over the Epstein scandal – a woman. Yes, Ghislaine Maxwell was jailed for conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors on Epstein’s private island, but what about the paedophiles who flew there on the Lolita Express? Why aren’t they named and shamed?

We clearly need the sisterhood now more than ever. But there are rules. Women no longer want a man’s seat on the bus; they want his seat on the board. Tell her if she’s being cheated on. Always take her side in a breakup. Be her wingwoman – stick to her like a nylon dress in a heat wave. And most important of all – be loyal. Husbands come and go, but your girlfriends last forever, so we should never let a penis come between us.

There is nothing more life-affirming than a strong female friendship. So raise your fist in feminist solidarity and shout it loud enough to raise the roof, shattering the glass ceiling simultaneously. The sisterhood rules!

Kathy Lette’s latest novel, ‘The Sisterhood Rules’,published by Head of Zeus, is out now

Why breaking up with your female friends is more painful than losing a lover

Mymothergave me the best gift imaginable – three sensationalsisters. Sisters possess a psychological shorthand; instinctively understan...
How will DC residents receive money from $9.9 million Live Nation settlement?

Washington DC has won nearly $10 million through a settlement with Live Nation over deceptive Ticketmaster pricing practices, and local residents may soon see money back in their pockets.

USA TODAY

What triggered the settlement secured byAttorney General Brian Schwalb, and how can people in DC receive their share of the settlement?

Here's what to know.

What did the attorney general investigation reveal?

The attorney general's office said it was awarded $9.9 million after an investigation found Live Nation "misled customers about ticket prices, charged deceptive fees and used illegal pressure tactics to get fans to buy tickets for a decade."

Live Nation is accused of violating the District of Columbia's Consumer Protection Procedures Act through what the attorney general's office calls "deceptive bait-and switch" tactics.

“For at least a decade, Live Nation and Ticketmaster boosted profits by charging predatory, hidden fees — taking advantage of DC residents buying tickets for their favorite artist or team and pricing others out entirely,” Schwalb said Monday. “With this settlement, we’re putting millions of dollars back into the pockets of DC fans and ensuring that the price fans see when they first start shopping for tickets is the price they actually pay.”

Advertisement

Live Nation made changes to its procedures last year after the attorney general's investigation.

What are the terms of the settlement?

Of the $9.9 million the District will receive, $8.9 million will go to Live Nation customers. The other $1 million will he paid to DC.

Live Nation is now required to show the full price of tickets up front, and they must share information about the purpose of extra fees and who profits from it.

How will DC residents get paid through Live Nation?

The attorney general's office said it will announce in the coming months how people can make claims to get their refunds.

For now, the details are still being worked out.

“It definitely will be based on what they paid in terms of fees. Whether we will be able to refund 100% of every single fee for 10 years, that's what we're trying to figure out,” Beth Mellen, assistant deputy attorney general in the public advocacy division, toldNBC Washington. “Our goal is to get as much of the $8.9 million out the door to consumers in their pockets."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:DC gets $9.9 million in settlement with Live Nation, Ticketmaster

How will DC residents receive money from $9.9 million Live Nation settlement?

Washington DC has won nearly $10 million through a settlement with Live Nation over deceptive Ticketmaster pricing practices, and local...
EU prepares to clash with US again over shipping carbon levy

By Kate Abnett and Jonathan Saul

Reuters

BRUSSELS/LONDON, April 24 (Reuters) - European Union countries agreed on Friday to keep pushing for a global price on shipping's CO2 emissions in U.N. talks ‌next week, setting up another potential clash with the United States over the proposal.

Governments at ‌the International Maritime Organization decided last year to postpone the climate plan by a year, after the Trump administration strongly opposed ​the measure and threatened to impose sanctions and visa restrictions on delegates who supported it.

That has not stopped European countries attempting to revive the plan, according to the EU's negotiating position for next week's IMO talks, seen by Reuters.

EU countries "shall oppose any attempts" to remove the climate measures from being negotiated at the meeting, ‌the document said.

EU countries will consider ⁠changes to the original carbon pricing plan if this helps gather support, the document said. However, some EU officials said they were pessimistic any compromise deal on climate ⁠measures could pass, given the firm opposition from the U.S..

Norway's environment minister Andreas Bjelland Eriksen said that the IMO still had a chance to strike a historic deal, but had to look at "different approaches" to avoid a ​repeat ​of last year's failure.

Advertisement

"Also... whether we can do some ​things already now and potentially postpone other ‌parts of the regulation to a later stage, for example," he added while speaking to journalists.

A total of 57 countries - among them, China and major shipping states including Liberia - voted to delay the carbon price at the meeting in October, versus 49 who sought to land a deal.

The supporters included European nations, Brazil and some small island countries vulnerable to climate change.

A coalition of the world’s top three ship ‌registries, Liberia, Panama and the Marshall Islands, plus oil tanker ​companies including Saudi Arabia’s Bahri urged IMO members to consider ​alternatives to the original carbon pricing plan when ​they meet next week.

"Support for the framework in its current form has continued ‌to erode" since the IMO meeting last year, ​they said in a ​statement.

The IMO decision last year split the EU, as Greece and Cyprus - each home to major shipping industries - broke ranks with the bloc and abstained in the vote, rather than supporting ​the EU-backed climate proposal.

Greece, Malta and ‌Italy declined to endorse the new EU negotiating position, which was passed by a reinforced ​majority of EU countries, officials said.

(Reporting by Kate Abnett and Jonathan Saul, additional reporting ​by Nerijus Adomaitis in Oslo; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)

EU prepares to clash with US again over shipping carbon levy

By Kate Abnett and Jonathan Saul BRUSSELS/LONDON, April 24 (Reuters) - European Union countries agreed on Friday to keep pushing ...
FBI scrambles to rebuild after surprise wave of retirements and resignations

The FBI and Justice Department are reportedly undertaking urgent measures to rebuild their depleted workforces following a significant wave of departures over the past year.

The Independent US FBI Director Kash Patel speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) (AP)

Efforts include easing hiring requirements and accelerating recruitment processes, moves that some current and former officials fear could compromise long-established professional standards.

The FBI has launched social media campaigns to attract applicants, introduced abbreviated training programmes for candidates transferring from other federal agencies, and relaxed criteria for support staff aspiring to become agents. These changes, detailed in internal communications seen by The Associated Press, are part of a broader push to fill vacancies. Concurrently, the Justice Department is now recruiting prosecutors directly from law school to address staffing shortages in US attorney’s offices nationwide.

Concerns are also being raised by some current and former agents regarding the FBI’s internal promotions, with claims that individuals with less experience than traditionally required are being elevated to leadership positions.

These adjustments reflect a wider strategy to stabilise a workforce strained by retirements and resignations. Many of these departures were reportedly prompted by concerns over the politicisation of the department during the previous Republican administration, alongside the dismissal of lawyers, agents, and other employees perceived as insufficiently loyal to the then-president’s agenda. Critics argue that these changes represent a significant reduction in standards for law enforcement institutions that have historically prided themselves on their professional expertise, and which are responsible for critical functions ranging from counter-terrorism to complex public corruption investigations.

“It’s a sign of, among other things, the difficulty the department is having right now in keeping and recruiting people,” said Greg Brower, a former U.S. attorney inNevadawho left the FBI in 2018 as its chief congressional liaison.

The FBI defended the changes as a necessary modernization of its hiring pipeline, saying it is streamlining, not lowering, standards and removing what it says were “bureaucratic” steps in the application process. It said applicants were still evaluated “on the same competencies.”

“The Bureau holds high standards for potential and current employees, and there is a rigorous application and background process to join the FBI,” the FBI said in a statement.

FBI agents (Getty)

The FBI has long been seen as the nation's premier federal law enforcement agency, with a recruitment process anchored around physical fitness tests, a writing assessment, interview and training academy atQuantico,Virginia.

Elements of the regimen have been periodically tweaked to fit the bureau's needs, including over the past year under the leadership of FBI DirectorKash Patel.

With a mantra to “let good cops be cops,” Patel announced last fall that transfers from other agencies such as theDrug Enforcement Administrationwould be able to complete a nine-week training academy instead of the traditional academy that spans more than four months. The change rankled some current and former officials who say the FBI's protocols, professional culture and diversity of cases it handles help to distinguish it from other agencies.

For support staff employees looking to become agents, the bureau more recently said it would waive requirements of a written assessment and an interview with a three-member panel of FBI agents meant to assess life experience and judgment, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the moves and an internal written message seen by the AP.

The FBI said onboard employees would still need recommendations from a senior leader and to complete Quantico training.

“We are not lowering standards or removing qualifications in any way. What we are doing is streamlining the process to remove duplicative, bureaucratic steps to the application system for onboard employees,” the FBI said in a statement, adding, "These are changes based on a wide variety of feedback from successful agents with over 20 years’ experience.”

Advertisement

Patel boasted in January of a 112% increase in applications, and the FBI says it has a “clear path” to add around 700 special agents this year and that its current Quantico class is one of its largest in years. But some people familiar with the matter say an applications uptick does not necessarily correspond to a surge in high-caliber recruits that can offset the attrition the bureau has endured.

At the other end of the employment spectrum, the FBI also faces turnover among senior leaders, including special agents in charge, the title given to leaders of most of the bureau's 56 field offices. Some were fired by Patel over the past year and others retired. Many offices are now led by someone who has been in the job for under a year.

Facing what current and former officials say is difficulty in filling some of the positions, the FBI has moved quickly to promote agents up the ladder, people familiar with the matter say. That includes elevating assistant special agents in charge to special agents in charge and opening the door for employees to be considered for leadership roles without the significant headquarters experience the FBI historically regarded as necessary for a holistic view of bureau operations.

As a conservative podcast host before becoming director, Patel had talked about shutting down FBI headquarters and transforming it into a museum of the “deep state” and told colleagues on his first day as director that he would move hundreds of employees fromWashingtoninto the field.

“As a field agent, you have a field agent’s mentality, you have a field agent's view,” said Chris Piehota, a retired FBI senior executive. Without adequate headquarters experience, he added, you don't know “the business side of the FBI, the logistical side of the FBI or the political jungle" that can accompany the job.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel speaks alongside Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche during a news conference at the at the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice building on April 21, 2026 (Getty)

The Justice Department, meanwhile, has lowered hiring prerequisites for some federal prosecutors.

Department officials recently suspended a policy that U.S. attorneys offices only hire prosecutors with at least one year of experience practicing law. The department did not explain the reason, but said in a statement that it is “proud to empower young and passionate prosecutors and offer attorneys at every level the opportunity to invest their talents into keeping their communities safe."

It comes as parts of the agency are struggling to keep up with the workload amid critical staffing shortages, with the department recently acknowledging that it has lost nearly 1,000 assistant U.S. attorneys.

InMinnesota, for example, the federal prosecutors’ office has been gutted by resignations amid frustration with the administration’s stepped-up immigration enforcement and the department’s response to fatal shootings of civilians by federal agents.

Justice Department headquarters inWashingtonhas endured staffing losses, too.

The number of lawyers in the Criminal Division’s Violent Crime and Racketeering Section, which prosecutes organized crime groups and violent gangs, is down significantly, though the section is looking to hire additional attorneys. A National Security Division section that works espionage cases has reported a 40% drop in prosecutors.

The department said in a statement that it has seen an increase in criminal complaints and indictments despite a loss in prosecutors, underscoring the “bloated, ineffective and weaponized” institution it says the administration inherited.

Officials have enlisted military lawyers to serve as special prosecutors in some offices. The administration has also used social media to recruit applicants. One recent post from the FBI'sOmaha,Nebraskaoffice said: "A calling bigger than yourself. A mission that matters. If you’re ready for the challenge, there’s a place for you on the FBI team.

Chad Mizelle, who served as chief of staff toTrump's first attorney general,Pam Bondi, recently urged lawyers to contact him on X if they want to become prosecutors, “and support President Trump and anti-crime agenda.” Mizelle’s post raised eyebrows not only because federal prosecutors have not generally been solicited over social media, but also because support for the president has not been a prerequisite for career employees.

“We need good prosecutors,” wrote Mizelle, who left the department in October. “And DOJ is hiring across the country. Now is your chance to join the mission and do good for our country.”

FBI scrambles to rebuild after surprise wave of retirements and resignations

The FBI and Justice Department are reportedly undertaking urgent measures to rebuild their depleted workforces following a significant ...
Appeals court says Trump's order suspending asylum claims at the border is unlawful

An appeals court on Friday affirmed adistrict court's rulingthat an executive order invoked by President Donald Trump to suspend immigration asylum claims is unlawful.

ABC News

In a divided 2-1 ruling, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed a court order saying the Immigration and Nationality Act allows migrants who cross the southern border apply for asylum.

Judge blocks Trump's asylum ban at southern border

"The INA does not allow the President to remove Plaintiffs under summary removal procedures of his own making," the court wrote. "Nor does it allow the Executive to suspend Plaintiffs' right to apply for asylum, deny Plaintiffs' access to withholding of removal under the INA, or curtail mandatory procedures for adjudicating Plaintiffs' Convention Against Torture claims."

On Day 1 of his second term in office, President Trump issued anexecutive orderhe called "Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion," which aimed to block immigrants from seeking asylum and other forms of relief once they enter the United States and to allow for their swift removal from the country.

Advertisement

Friday's ruling means that migrants who make it to U.S. soil, whether at a legal port of entry or in between, can legally seek asylum as has been allowed in previous administrations.

John Moore/Getty Images, FILE - PHOTO: In this Jan. 20, 2025, file photo, immigrants prepare to be transported by U.S. Border Patrol agents after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border near Sasabe, Arizona.

The Trump administration will likely appeal the decision, which could set up a possible showdown at the Supreme Court.

"This decision will potentially save the lives of thousands of people fleeing grave danger who were denied even a hearing under the Trump administration's horrific asylum ban," said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, who argued the appeal.

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said they "strongly disagree" with the ruling and that "this will not be the last word on this matter."

"America's asylum system was never intended to be used as a de facto amnesty program or a catch-all, get-out-of-deportation-free card. President Trump's top priority remains the screening and vetting of all aliens seeking to come, live, or work in the United States," the spokesperson said. "We will use all of the tools in our toolbox to ensure that the integrity of our legal immigration system is upheld, fraud is uncovered and expeditiously addressed, and illegal aliens are removed from the country."

Appeals court says Trump's order suspending asylum claims at the border is unlawful

An appeals court on Friday affirmed adistrict court's rulingthat an executive order invoked by President Donald Trump to suspend im...

 

INS MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com