Bryan Bedder/Getty The Beastie Boys and Universal Music Group have settled their lawsuit with Chili's parent company over copyright infringement Chili's allegedly used "Sabotage" for an ad without their permission in November 2022 The band previously sued the makers of Monster Energy drink for using several of their songs for an ad and were awarded $1.7 million No more ill communication here. The Beastie Boysand Universal Music Group have settled their lawsuit with Chili's for allegedly using "Sabotage" for an ad without their permission. According to court documents obtained by PEOPLE, filings dated Wednesday, May 21, revealed that the band comprised of Michael Diamond, Adam Horovitz andthe late Adam Yauch(who was represented by the executor of his estate) and UMG reached a settlement with Chili's parent company, Brinker International earlier this month outside of court. Brinker International has until July 7 to file a dismissal. The exact details of the settlement, which was "reached an agreement in principle to settle the case," have yet to be revealed. PEOPLE reached out to the Beastie Boys and Brinker International for comment and did not receive an immediate response. Lynn Goldsmith/Corbis/VCG via Getty The PEOPLE Appis now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! The Beastie Boys and UMGinitially sued Brinker International in July 2024on claims of copyright infringement. Per court documents obtained by PEOPLE, the band alleged that the use of the 1994 was unauthorized, along with the company reproducing an advertisement that was very similar to the 2002 music video directed by Spike Jonze. The Chili's commercial, which first debuted in November 2022, showed "three characters wearing obvious '70s-style wigs, fake mustaches, and sunglasses who were intended to evoke the three members of Beastie Boys," the suit alleged, much like the music video starring the Beastie Boys. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! Using "Sabotage" for the ad and recreating the music video allegedly infringed on the band's ownership of the song, which is protected by the United States Copyright Office. "Use of the 'Sabotage' sound recording, music composition and video was all without permission," the suit reads. "The plaintiffs do not license 'Sabotage' or any of their other intellectual property for third-party product advertising purposes, and deceased Beastie Boys member Adam Yauch included a provision in his will prohibiting such uses." Yauch, who died in 2012 after being diagnosed with cancer, famously noted in his will that "in no event may my image or name or any music or any artistic property created by me be used for advertising purposes,"according to the Associated Press. The Beastie Boys sought no "less than $150,000 for the willful infringement" over the use of their song without their permission. They also called for a trial by jury if necessary. Jason Mendez/Getty The Beastie Boys take the use of their music without their permission seriously and have stated in the past that they would never license their songs to sell products. They previously sued the makers of Monster Energy drink for the unauthorized use of their songs "Sabotage," "So What'cha Want," "Make Some Noise," "Pass the Mic" and "Looking Down the Barrel of a Gun" in a commercial. Perthe AP, the band was rewarded $1.7 million in a settlement in June 2014. Read the original article onPeople